Huh; warmongers through a complicit media is twisting American’s intelligence and sense of focus. The beast Netanyahu’s attack on Iran is being rephrased by its war dogs in the USA senate as “PREVENTIVE” war. A law is being prepared by Israel’s war dogs in the US senate that will declare USA’s unconditional support to Bibi/infantile Netanyahu shall he decide whimsically that it’s time to go to “preventive war” versus Iran. When does going to war become “war prevention” but hey; “war is peace” has always been US politician’s paradoxical logic to justify its war adventures. The only way to prevent war is by not going to war; stupid. You don’t prevent crushing to your death by jumping from the top of the empire state Building!
New Senate Push to Pledge Unconditional Support for Israeli "Preventive" War on Iran
By Jamal Abdi
October 13, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - - Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is planning to press the Senate next month to pledge U.S. troops, money, and political support to Israel should Bibi Netanyahu launch a preventive war on Iran.
By Jamal Abdi
October 13, 2012 "Information Clearing House" - - Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is planning to press the Senate next month to pledge U.S. troops, money, and political support to Israel should Bibi Netanyahu launch a preventive war on Iran.
SNIP:
Graham's mendacity on Iran policy should by now be notorious. His most recent victory was to convince Congress to endorse Netanayhu's redline for war with Iran instead of the redline laid out by the president. The trick was that, in pushing that measure, Graham disingenuously claimed that Obama's redline was nuclear weapons "capability." And Congress bought it. In reality, the president very clearly rejected that redline and said the U.S redline was to prevent Iran from actually getting the bomb, not getting an amorphous "capability."
But Graham (and Bibi) won the battle on the Hill. Both the House and the Senate voted to endorse Netanyahu's redline, not Obama's. To be fair, many in the House and Senate who supported the resolution still have no idea that there is a difference. They read the talking points circulated by Graham and AIPAC (the measure's chief advocates), and to this day think they were simply voting to endorse what Obama had already said.
Please read full article:
'via Blog this'
No comments:
Post a Comment