IMPEACHMENT: STILL THE BEST SHOW IN TOWN kahit nakakainis
:-(
The court wasted more than 2 hours on a fishing expedition
by the prosecutors. Funny, the prosecutors should have anticipated that any witness from MEGAWORLD they put on the stand would not help their case. They
should have asked direct questions that could be answered with a yes or no.
The developer will be devising their own strategy to save
their own skin from this obvious spurious deal. It took the senator judges to
ask for documents that the prosecutors should be asking for, but these documents
will not be presented as evidence for the prosecution :-(
The questioning should have taken a few minutes, not a few hours, that should have gone this way:
Prosecutor:
Q1. You testified that the price was not discounted but reduced
due to typhoon damages; yes or no?
Q2. Where is the engineering estimate of the damages? [Senator
Osmena] (Issue subpoena)
Q3. If you claim that it might be lost because of the time
lapsed, give us the name of the company and the persons who did the damage
estimate. (Subpoena the company’s engineering department)
Q4. Obviously, the Coronas will not move into an unfinished
and damaged penthouse unit. Give us the name of the construction company that
repaired the unit you claimed was damaged. The Coronas spent more
than the discount or reduced price you gave them. We want the receipt for the
repairs. (Subpoena the company)
Q5. Give us the name of the insurance company that insured
your building. Maybe you got more from the insurance company than the reduced
price you offered the CJ. (Subpoena the insurance company)
:-) We know the witness is lying. He will not be able to
produce any or all of the above, but the prosecutors ended up with MEGAWORLD washing its hands of doubts in the minds of the people that it was a party to
the CJ schemes.
Senator Lacson finally asked the question that gave the
witness a chance to read a long, defensive text prepared by MEGAWORLD. They made
it appear like they lost their cases while Corona is sitting as CJ. The prosecutor’s
witness ended up acting as a witness for the defense ;-)
NLK
No comments:
Post a Comment