Is this one reason why Khadaffy was murdered by USA/NATO? Megrahi; the convicted alleged terrorists for the so-called Lockerbie bombing (1988) never confessed to the crime in fact he submitted a second appeal to the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission but he dropped the appeal as one condition for his immediate release on humanitarian ground. It was when some members of the Scottish Criminal Review Commission started talking to the media having found the conviction preposterous that Megrahi was haphazardly released in August, 2009. He was diagnosed with prostatic cancer giving him only 3 months to live at the most. He was asked to drop his appeal (to keep his case from being reviewed) and released. He did not die; he is alive to this day that made the doctors as suspected partners to the scheme but there is a greater catch; Khadaffy already paid 1.5 billion dollars to the families with a chunk of the amount going to the US government. If Khadaffy were alive; can he demand for the return of the money and additional compensation for the decades of embargo that crippled Libya’s economy and progress? Those families of the victims who celebrated the brutal murder of Khadaffy on television; will they in their righteous conscience return the millions of dollars paid to each of them by Khadaffy whose murder they cheered?
The original suspect was actually Iran but USA cannot drag Iran to the issue without dragging USA to the motives; USA’s navy shooting down in the Gulf of an Iran civilian airline that killed hundreds of innocent Iranians. For Iran; it was a righteous kill…an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth.
Lockerbie: Report reveals Megrahi may be innocent
A Libyan man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing in 1988 may have suffered “a miscarriage of justice”, according to a Scottish authority that reviewed his case.
Its 820-page report, made public on the internet for the first time last Sunday, is the most significant official statement yet giving credibility to Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi’s claim that he is innocent.
The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission cast doubts on the credibility of crucial evidence given by Sliema shopkeeper Tony Gauci, a key prosecution witness, who had identified Mr Megrahi as “the Libyan” who bought clothes from his shop.
After reviewing Mr Gauci’s confused testimony about the day when Mr Megrahi was supposed to have bought the clothes from his shop and the problems related with his identification of the man, the commission said it was of the opinion that “no reasonable trial court could have drawn the inference” that Mr Megrahi was the purchaser of the clothes.
Full article:
'via Blog this'
No comments:
Post a Comment